PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.00 - 0.01
0.00 - 0.02
289 / 496.9K (Avg.)
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
107.71%
Net income growth above 1.5x PLUG's 6.77%. David Dodd would see a clear bottom-line advantage if it is backed by stable operations.
-59.31%
Negative yoy D&A while PLUG is 4.69%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-127.39%
Both negative yoy, with PLUG at -6708.22%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
-274.48%
Negative yoy CFO while PLUG is 17.45%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
64.78%
CapEx growth well above PLUG's 89.82%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier cash outlays that risk short-term free cash flow vs. competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-213.07%
We reduce yoy other investing while PLUG is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
-274.48%
Both yoy lines negative, with PLUG at -100.57%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
-219.84%
We cut debt repayment yoy while PLUG is 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
-100.00%
Negative yoy issuance while PLUG is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.