PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.00 - 0.01
0.00 - 0.02
289 / 496.9K (Avg.)
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-45.78%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with PLUG at -2.04%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
74.46%
D&A growth well above PLUG's 7.07%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
100.00%
Slight usage while PLUG is negative at -120.49%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
-100.00%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with PLUG at -120.39%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
-100.00%
Negative yoy inventory while PLUG is 134.92%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
100.00%
Growth well above PLUG's 133.79%. Michael Burry would see a potential hidden liquidity or overhead issue overshadowing competitor's approach.
-185.57%
Negative yoy while PLUG is 267.15%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
-124.17%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with PLUG at -213.81%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
74.64%
CapEx growth well above PLUG's 73.23%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier cash outlays that risk short-term free cash flow vs. competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
13309.09%
Growth of 13309.09% while PLUG is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a moderate difference requiring justification by ROI in these smaller invests.
75.91%
Investing outflow well above PLUG's 73.23%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
100.00%
Debt repayment above 1.5x PLUG's 42.11%, indicating stronger deleveraging. David Dodd would verify if expansions are not neglected.
-100.00%
Both yoy lines negative, with PLUG at -100.00%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment or preference for internal financing over new equity in the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.