PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.00 - 0.01
0.00 - 0.02
289 / 496.9K (Avg.)
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-40.11%
Negative net income growth while PLUG stands at 87.24%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
-52.61%
Negative yoy D&A while PLUG is 28.37%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Both reduce yoy usage, with PLUG at -231.10%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
100.00%
AR growth while PLUG is negative at -99.84%. John Neff would note competitor possibly improving working capital while we allow AR to rise.
-100.00%
Both reduce yoy inventory, with PLUG at -725.09%. Martin Whitman would find a widespread caution or cyclical demand drop in the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Negative yoy usage while PLUG is 70.83%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
-108.42%
Both negative yoy, with PLUG at -100.01%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
-93.22%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with PLUG at -8265.90%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
77.83%
CapEx growth well above PLUG's 44.07%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier cash outlays that risk short-term free cash flow vs. competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Both yoy lines negative, with PLUG at -234301.16%. Martin Whitman suspects a cyclical or strategic rationale for cutting extra invests in the niche.
77.84%
We have mild expansions while PLUG is negative at -1671.37%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
67.43%
Debt repayment above 1.5x PLUG's 13.09%, indicating stronger deleveraging. David Dodd would verify if expansions are not neglected.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.