PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.00 - 0.01
0.00 - 0.02
289 / 496.9K (Avg.)
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-104.47%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with PLUG at -7.06%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
-45.70%
Negative yoy D&A while PLUG is 42.95%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-767.57%
Both negative yoy, with PLUG at -530.69%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
49.89%
Operating cash flow growth above 1.5x PLUG's 21.36%. David Dodd would confirm superior cost control or stronger revenue-to-cash conversion.
33.22%
Some CapEx rise while PLUG is negative at -150.01%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
-100.00%
Negative yoy acquisition while PLUG stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
We reduce yoy other investing while PLUG is 76.54%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
33.18%
Lower net investing outflow yoy vs. PLUG's 139.61%, preserving short-term cash. David Dodd would confirm expansions remain sufficient.
100.00%
We repay more while PLUG is negative at -94.65%. John Neff notes advantage in lowering leverage if competitor is ramping up debt or repaying less.
-100.00%
Negative yoy issuance while PLUG is 400.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
100.00%
Buyback growth of 100.00% while PLUG is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.