PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.00 - 0.01
0.00 - 0.02
289 / 496.9K (Avg.)
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-139.08%
Negative net income growth while PLUG stands at 53.96%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
-40.62%
Both reduce yoy D&A, with PLUG at -16.30%. Martin Whitman would suspect a lull in expansions or intangible additions for both.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
100.00%
Less working capital growth vs. PLUG's 294.98%, indicating potentially more efficient day-to-day cash usage. David Dodd would confirm no negative impact on revenue.
100.00%
AR growth is negative or stable vs. PLUG's 209.51%, indicating tighter credit discipline. David Dodd would confirm it doesn't hamper sales volume.
100.00%
Some inventory rise while PLUG is negative at -1333.48%. John Neff would see competitor possibly benefiting from leaner stock if demand remains.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Both reduce yoy usage, with PLUG at -179.34%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
128.24%
Some yoy increase while PLUG is negative at -92.00%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
129.64%
Operating cash flow growth above 1.5x PLUG's 30.88%. David Dodd would confirm superior cost control or stronger revenue-to-cash conversion.
73.21%
CapEx growth well above PLUG's 46.94%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier cash outlays that risk short-term free cash flow vs. competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-206.05%
Both yoy lines negative, with PLUG at -278.08%. Martin Whitman suspects a cyclical or strategic rationale for cutting extra invests in the niche.
72.86%
We have mild expansions while PLUG is negative at -145.07%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
100.00%
We repay more while PLUG is negative at -224.03%. John Neff notes advantage in lowering leverage if competitor is ramping up debt or repaying less.
-100.00%
Negative yoy issuance while PLUG is 101682.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.