PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.00 - 0.01
0.00 - 0.02
289 / 496.9K (Avg.)
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
24.28%
Less D&A growth vs. SLDP's 103.23%, reducing the hit to reported earnings. David Dodd would confirm that core assets remain sufficient.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
91.51%
Lower 'other non-cash' growth vs. SLDP's 245.15%, indicating steadier reported figures. David Dodd would confirm no missed necessary write-downs or gains.
-92.07%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with SLDP at -46.01%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
16.02%
Some CapEx rise while SLDP is negative at -114.27%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-128.24%
We reduce yoy other investing while SLDP is 73186.61%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
-92.07%
We reduce yoy invests while SLDP stands at 1195.36%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
83.01%
We repay more while SLDP is negative at -95.40%. John Neff notes advantage in lowering leverage if competitor is ramping up debt or repaying less.
-73.78%
Negative yoy issuance while SLDP is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.