PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.00 - 0.01
0.00 - 0.02
289 / 496.9K (Avg.)
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-103.99%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with SLDP at -205.43%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
23.87%
Less D&A growth vs. SLDP's 103.23%, reducing the hit to reported earnings. David Dodd would confirm that core assets remain sufficient.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
248.93%
SBC growth while SLDP is negative at -551.75%. John Neff would see competitor possibly controlling share issuance more tightly.
100.00%
Well above SLDP's 69.68% if positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a risk of bigger working capital demands vs. competitor, harming free cash flow.
100.00%
AR growth while SLDP is negative at -432.81%. John Neff would note competitor possibly improving working capital while we allow AR to rise.
100.00%
Inventory growth of 100.00% while SLDP is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate build that must match future sales to avoid risk.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Negative yoy usage while SLDP is 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
-235.24%
Negative yoy while SLDP is 245.15%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
-23.93%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with SLDP at -46.01%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
32.57%
Some CapEx rise while SLDP is negative at -114.27%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
We reduce yoy other investing while SLDP is 73186.61%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
32.57%
Lower net investing outflow yoy vs. SLDP's 1195.36%, preserving short-term cash. David Dodd would confirm expansions remain sufficient.
100.00%
We repay more while SLDP is negative at -95.40%. John Neff notes advantage in lowering leverage if competitor is ramping up debt or repaying less.
-100.00%
Negative yoy issuance while SLDP is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.