PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.00 - 0.01
0.00 - 0.02
289 / 496.9K (Avg.)
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-104.47%
Negative net income growth while SLDP stands at 8.88%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
-45.70%
Negative yoy D&A while SLDP is 2.33%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-767.57%
Both negative yoy, with SLDP at -97.70%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
49.89%
Some CFO growth while SLDP is negative at -20.94%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
33.22%
CapEx growth well above SLDP's 22.65%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier cash outlays that risk short-term free cash flow vs. competitor.
-100.00%
Negative yoy acquisition while SLDP stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Both yoy lines negative, with SLDP at -85.71%. Martin Whitman suspects a cyclical or strategic rationale for cutting extra invests in the niche.
33.18%
Investing outflow well above SLDP's 22.65%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
100.00%
Debt repayment 1.25-1.5x SLDP's 75.67%. Bruce Berkowitz would see an edge in lowering interest burdens unless competitor invests in profitable expansions.
-100.00%
Negative yoy issuance while SLDP is 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
100.00%
Buyback growth of 100.00% while SLDP is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.