PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.00 - 0.01
0.00 - 0.02
289 / 496.9K (Avg.)
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
64.16%
EBIT growth below 50% of ANO.AX's 155.25%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper competitive or cost structure issues.
64.16%
Operating income growth under 50% of ANO.AX's 648.74%. Michael Burry would be concerned about deeper cost or sales issues.
100.00%
Net income growth at 50-75% of ANO.AX's 161.71%. Martin Whitman would question fundamental disadvantages in expenses or demand.
100.00%
EPS growth at 50-75% of ANO.AX's 161.29%. Martin Whitman would suspect a lag in operational efficiency or a higher share count.
100.00%
Diluted EPS growth at 50-75% of ANO.AX's 161.54%. Martin Whitman would question if share issuance or modest net income gains hamper progress.
34.05%
Share count expansion well above ANO.AX's 0.62%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
34.05%
Diluted share count expanding well above ANO.AX's 0.46%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
99.12%
Positive FCF growth while ANO.AX is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
690.15%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x ANO.AX's 223.10%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
5952.45%
Positive 5Y CAGR while ANO.AX is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
116.35%
10Y OCF/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x ANO.AX's 77.99%. Bruce Berkowitz would confirm if the firm's long-term capital allocation yields better cash returns.
132.35%
Positive OCF/share growth while ANO.AX is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR while ANO.AX is at 4293.06%. Joel Greenblatt sees a major red flag in long-term profit erosion.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.