PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.00 - 0.01
0.00 - 0.02
289 / 496.9K (Avg.)
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
5.36%
Revenue growth of 5.36% while ANO.AX is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would check if a small edge can widen further.
15.75%
Gross profit growth of 15.75% while ANO.AX is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minimal improvements could expand further.
34.85%
EBIT growth of 34.85% while ANO.AX is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small gains can be scaled further.
34.85%
Operating income growth of 34.85% while ANO.AX is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if this modest edge can become significant.
-100.00%
Negative net income growth while ANO.AX stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-100.00%
Negative EPS growth while ANO.AX is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-100.00%
Negative diluted EPS growth while ANO.AX is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
69.26%
Share change of 69.26% while ANO.AX is at zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if slight buybacks (or dilution) matter in the bigger picture.
46.43%
Diluted share change of 46.43% while ANO.AX is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a minor difference that could widen over time.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-23.93%
Negative FCF growth while ANO.AX is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
5424.68%
10Y CAGR of 5424.68% while ANO.AX is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if incremental growth can widen into a significant edge.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-89.62%
Negative 3Y CAGR while ANO.AX stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
95.16%
OCF/share CAGR of 95.16% while ANO.AX is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that could compound over time.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-123.87%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while ANO.AX stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
100.00%
Net income/share CAGR of 100.00% while ANO.AX is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small mid-term gains can develop into a bigger lead.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-85.69%
We cut SG&A while ANO.AX invests at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.