PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.00 - 0.01
0.00 - 0.02
289 / 496.9K (Avg.)
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-10.31%
Negative revenue growth while ANO.AX stands at 62.13%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-20.84%
Negative gross profit growth while ANO.AX is at 251.94%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
11.25%
EBIT growth below 50% of ANO.AX's 155.25%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper competitive or cost structure issues.
11.25%
Operating income growth under 50% of ANO.AX's 648.74%. Michael Burry would be concerned about deeper cost or sales issues.
-11.48%
Negative net income growth while ANO.AX stands at 161.71%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-25.00%
Negative EPS growth while ANO.AX is at 161.29%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.20%
Share count expansion well above ANO.AX's 0.62%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
-3.09%
Reduced diluted shares while ANO.AX is at 0.46%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
260.14%
Positive OCF growth while ANO.AX is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
209.36%
Positive FCF growth while ANO.AX is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
-37.28%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while ANO.AX stands at 223.10%. Joel Greenblatt would question if the company is failing to keep pace with industry changes.
145.79%
Positive 5Y CAGR while ANO.AX is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
160.72%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x ANO.AX's 6.96%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
127.83%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x ANO.AX's 77.99%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
278.97%
Positive OCF/share growth while ANO.AX is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
253.00%
3Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of ANO.AX's 878.66%. Michael Burry would worry about a significant short-term disadvantage in generating operational cash.
193.55%
Below 50% of ANO.AX's 4293.06%. Michael Burry would worry about a sizable gap in long-term profitability gains vs. the competitor.
123.72%
Positive 5Y CAGR while ANO.AX is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
3.87%
Positive short-term CAGR while ANO.AX is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
719.84%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x ANO.AX's 53.02%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
104.09%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x ANO.AX's 0.05%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-91.28%
Firm’s AR is declining while ANO.AX shows 53.52%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
121.34%
We show growth while ANO.AX is shrinking stock. John Neff wonders if the competitor is more disciplined or has weaker demand expectations.
15.40%
Asset growth above 1.5x ANO.AX's 3.20%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
14.90%
BV/share growth above 1.5x ANO.AX's 2.14%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
-9.29%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
30.83%
SG&A growth well above ANO.AX's 14.86%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.