PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.00 - 0.01
0.00 - 0.02
289 / 496.9K (Avg.)
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
100.00%
Revenue growth of 100.00% while ANO.AX is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would check if a small edge can widen further.
18.63%
Gross profit growth of 18.63% while ANO.AX is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minimal improvements could expand further.
76.71%
EBIT growth of 76.71% while ANO.AX is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small gains can be scaled further.
76.71%
Operating income growth of 76.71% while ANO.AX is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if this modest edge can become significant.
100.00%
Net income growth of 100.00% while ANO.AX is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small gains can accelerate into a larger gap.
100.00%
EPS growth of 100.00% while ANO.AX is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minimal gains can accelerate over time.
100.00%
Diluted EPS growth of 100.00% while ANO.AX is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minimal gains can be scaled further for a bigger lead.
3.20%
Share change of 3.20% while ANO.AX is at zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if slight buybacks (or dilution) matter in the bigger picture.
3.20%
Diluted share change of 3.20% while ANO.AX is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a minor difference that could widen over time.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
100.00%
OCF growth of 100.00% while ANO.AX is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small gains can expand into a larger competitive lead.
100.00%
FCF growth of 100.00% while ANO.AX is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if modest improvements in free cash can accelerate further.
120.46%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of ANO.AX's 294.73%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
522.65%
5Y revenue/share CAGR similar to ANO.AX's 526.72%. Walter Schloss might see both companies benefiting from the same mid-term trends.
608.72%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x ANO.AX's 388.78%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
9689.57%
OCF/share CAGR of 9689.57% while ANO.AX is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that could compound over time.
692.97%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x ANO.AX's 96.02%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
1414.39%
3Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x ANO.AX's 225.53%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is quickly gaining an operational edge over the competitor.
219.36%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x ANO.AX's 145.42% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
1837.97%
Below 50% of ANO.AX's 16402.89%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
6156.15%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x ANO.AX's 2755.00%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
448.62%
5Y equity/share CAGR is in line with ANO.AX's 497.21%. Walter Schloss would see parallel mid-term profitability and retention policies.
95.88%
Below 50% of ANO.AX's 525.01%. Michael Burry suspects a serious short-term disadvantage in building book value.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-3.10%
We have a declining book value while ANO.AX shows 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
8.49%
Debt growth of 8.49% while ANO.AX is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees additional leverage that must yield profitable expansions to be worthwhile.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
24.21%
SG&A growth of 24.21% while ANO.AX is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees more spend on admin or marketing, expecting stronger top-line in return.