PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.00 - 0.01
0.00 - 0.02
1.30M / 496.9K (Avg.)
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
17.40%
Revenue growth under 50% of ANO.AX's 62.13%. Michael Burry would suspect a deteriorating sales pipeline or weaker brand.
313.44%
Gross profit growth 1.25-1.5x ANO.AX's 251.94%. Bruce Berkowitz would see if strategic sourcing or brand premium explains outperformance.
1367.46%
EBIT growth above 1.5x ANO.AX's 155.25%. David Dodd would confirm if core operations or niche positioning yield superior profitability.
1367.46%
Operating income growth above 1.5x ANO.AX's 648.74%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent cost or pricing advantages drive this outperformance.
2002.95%
Net income growth above 1.5x ANO.AX's 161.71%. David Dodd would check if a unique moat or cost structure secures superior bottom-line gains.
1300.00%
EPS growth above 1.5x ANO.AX's 161.29%. David Dodd would review if superior product economics or effective buybacks drive the outperformance.
1300.00%
Diluted EPS growth above 1.5x ANO.AX's 161.54%. David Dodd would see if there's a robust moat protecting these shareholder gains.
1.23%
Share count expansion well above ANO.AX's 0.62%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
-17.11%
Reduced diluted shares while ANO.AX is at 0.46%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
111.33%
Positive OCF growth while ANO.AX is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
282.53%
Positive FCF growth while ANO.AX is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
350.78%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x ANO.AX's 223.10%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
343.23%
Positive 5Y CAGR while ANO.AX is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
70.38%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x ANO.AX's 6.96%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
3628.75%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x ANO.AX's 77.99%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
1723.11%
Positive OCF/share growth while ANO.AX is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
-1.35%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while ANO.AX stands at 878.66%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
550.00%
Below 50% of ANO.AX's 4293.06%. Michael Burry would worry about a sizable gap in long-term profitability gains vs. the competitor.
1250.00%
Positive 5Y CAGR while ANO.AX is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
170.00%
Positive short-term CAGR while ANO.AX is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
20909.17%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x ANO.AX's 813.84%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
115.51%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x ANO.AX's 53.02%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
37.12%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x ANO.AX's 0.05%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
119.77%
AR growth well above ANO.AX's 53.52%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
1178.20%
We show growth while ANO.AX is shrinking stock. John Neff wonders if the competitor is more disciplined or has weaker demand expectations.
28.54%
Asset growth above 1.5x ANO.AX's 3.20%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
40.45%
BV/share growth above 1.5x ANO.AX's 2.14%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
-49.27%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
-100.00%
Both reduce R&D yoy. Martin Whitman sees an industry shifting to cost reduction or limited breakthroughs in the near term.
51.29%
SG&A growth well above ANO.AX's 14.86%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.