PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.00 - 0.01
0.00 - 0.02
289 / 496.9K (Avg.)
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
377.61%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x ANO.AX's 55.68%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
-7.19%
Both face negative 5Y revenue/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect macro headwinds or obsolete product offerings across the niche.
58.01%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x ANO.AX's 19.99%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
440.27%
10Y OCF/share CAGR at 50-75% of ANO.AX's 815.74%. Martin Whitman might fear a structural deficiency in operational efficiency.
-9.19%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while ANO.AX is at 529.33%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s operational model or cost structure.
32.36%
3Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of ANO.AX's 353.81%. Michael Burry would worry about a significant short-term disadvantage in generating operational cash.
525.64%
Positive 10Y CAGR while ANO.AX is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
33.58%
Positive 5Y CAGR while ANO.AX is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
2633.13%
Positive short-term CAGR while ANO.AX is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
1810.25%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x ANO.AX's 766.35%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
122.58%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x ANO.AX's 77.45%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
86.61%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x ANO.AX's 18.27%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
21.20%
Debt growth of 21.20% while ANO.AX is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees additional leverage that must yield profitable expansions to be worthwhile.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.