PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.00 - 0.01
0.00 - 0.02
289 / 496.9K (Avg.)
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-100.00%
Negative revenue growth while ECL.AX stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-100.00%
Negative gross profit growth while ECL.AX is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-699.67%
Negative EBIT growth while ECL.AX is at 30.75%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-699.67%
Negative operating income growth while ECL.AX is at 30.75%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
3.05%
Share count expansion well above ECL.AX's 3.87%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
3.05%
Diluted share count expanding well above ECL.AX's 3.87%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
100.00%
OCF growth of 100.00% while ECL.AX is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small gains can expand into a larger competitive lead.
99.68%
FCF growth above 1.5x ECL.AX's 40.83%. David Dodd would verify if the firm’s strategic investments yield superior returns.
-100.00%
Both companies have negative long-term revenue/share growth. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking.
-100.00%
Both face negative 5Y revenue/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect macro headwinds or obsolete product offerings across the niche.
-100.00%
Both firms have negative 3Y CAGR. Martin Whitman would wonder if the entire market segment is in short-term retreat.
100.00%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while ECL.AX is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
100.00%
Positive OCF/share growth while ECL.AX is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
100.00%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while ECL.AX is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
-100.00%
Both face negative decade-long net income/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect a shrinking or highly disrupted sector.
-100.00%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.