PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.00 - 0.01
0.00 - 0.02
289 / 496.9K (Avg.)
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
170.06%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while ECL.AX is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
-56.63%
Both face negative 5Y revenue/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect macro headwinds or obsolete product offerings across the niche.
-28.37%
Both firms have negative 3Y CAGR. Martin Whitman would wonder if the entire market segment is in short-term retreat.
-428.17%
Both show negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking or too capital-intensive.
-141.38%
Both show negative mid-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman might suspect a challenged environment or large capital demands for both.
11.42%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while ECL.AX is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
498.00%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x ECL.AX's 12.77% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
-69.14%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
2.18%
Positive short-term CAGR while ECL.AX is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
935.04%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x ECL.AX's 139.38%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
88.66%
5Y equity/share CAGR at 50-75% of ECL.AX's 136.81%. Martin Whitman would question a shortfall in capital accumulation vs. the competitor.
90.09%
3Y equity/share CAGR at 75-90% of ECL.AX's 106.52%. Bill Ackman pushes for margin or operational changes to match the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.