PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.00 - 0.01
0.00 - 0.02
1.30M / 496.9K (Avg.)
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
9.00%
Positive revenue growth while LBL.AX is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
8.77%
Positive gross profit growth while LBL.AX is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
75.69%
Positive EBIT growth while LBL.AX is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
75.69%
Positive operating income growth while LBL.AX is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
77.97%
Net income growth 1.25-1.5x LBL.AX's 63.38%. Bruce Berkowitz would see if strategic cost cutting or product mix explains this difference.
100.00%
EPS growth above 1.5x LBL.AX's 63.29%. David Dodd would review if superior product economics or effective buybacks drive the outperformance.
66.67%
Similar diluted EPS growth to LBL.AX's 63.29%. Walter Schloss might see standard sector or cyclical influences on both firms.
31.77%
Share count expansion well above LBL.AX's 0.03%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
9.28%
Diluted share count expanding well above LBL.AX's 0.03%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
311.99%
Positive OCF growth while LBL.AX is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
225.39%
Positive FCF growth while LBL.AX is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
-87.28%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while LBL.AX stands at 187.10%. Joel Greenblatt would question if the company is failing to keep pace with industry changes.
-74.73%
Negative 5Y CAGR while LBL.AX stands at 187.10%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.
-64.55%
Negative 3Y CAGR while LBL.AX stands at 8.14%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-74.79%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while LBL.AX is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s operational model or cost structure.
321.80%
3Y OCF/share CAGR of 321.80% while LBL.AX is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see if small gains can expand into a broader advantage.
-100.57%
Both face negative decade-long net income/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect a shrinking or highly disrupted sector.
61.50%
Positive 5Y CAGR while LBL.AX is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
93.84%
Positive short-term CAGR while LBL.AX is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
38.55%
Our AR growth while LBL.AX is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
-7.33%
Both reduce inventory yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader move to lean operations or industry slowdown in demand.
7.41%
Positive asset growth while LBL.AX is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
-129.89%
We have a declining book value while LBL.AX shows 0.99%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
5.94%
We expand SG&A while LBL.AX cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.