PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.00 - 0.01
0.00 - 0.02
289 / 496.9K (Avg.)
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
187.83%
Positive revenue growth while LBL.AX is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
141.82%
Positive gross profit growth while LBL.AX is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
1131.48%
Positive EBIT growth while LBL.AX is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
1131.48%
Positive operating income growth while LBL.AX is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
682.71%
Positive net income growth while LBL.AX is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
500.00%
Positive EPS growth while LBL.AX is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
500.00%
Positive diluted EPS growth while LBL.AX is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
-3.85%
Share reduction while LBL.AX is at 2.48%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-2.97%
Reduced diluted shares while LBL.AX is at 2.48%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1723.26%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-4204.46%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
-31.83%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while LBL.AX stands at 228.01%. Joel Greenblatt would question if the company is failing to keep pace with industry changes.
221.27%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x LBL.AX's 46.12%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
105.69%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x LBL.AX's 25.81%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
-277.17%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while LBL.AX stands at 45.65%. Joel Greenblatt would scrutinize managerial effectiveness and product competitiveness.
-424.53%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while LBL.AX is at 30.04%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s operational model or cost structure.
-668.10%
Both face negative short-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman would suspect macro or cyclical issues hitting them both.
408.00%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x LBL.AX's 196.67% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
500.00%
Positive 5Y CAGR while LBL.AX is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
60.00%
Positive short-term CAGR while LBL.AX is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1831.22%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x LBL.AX's 188.95%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
116.58%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x LBL.AX's 29.77%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
219.76%
AR growth well above LBL.AX's 32.45%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
-7.99%
Inventory is declining while LBL.AX stands at 6.76%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
28.58%
Positive asset growth while LBL.AX is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
27.93%
Positive BV/share change while LBL.AX is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
51.86%
We have some new debt while LBL.AX reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
-100.00%
Both reduce R&D yoy. Martin Whitman sees an industry shifting to cost reduction or limited breakthroughs in the near term.
15.25%
SG&A growth well above LBL.AX's 28.87%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.