PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.00 - 0.01
0.00 - 0.02
289 / 496.9K (Avg.)
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-10.31%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
-20.84%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
11.25%
Positive EBIT growth while LBL.AX is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
11.25%
Positive operating income growth while LBL.AX is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
-11.48%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-25.00%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.20%
Share reduction more than 1.5x LBL.AX's 2.48%. David Dodd would see if the company is taking advantage of undervaluation to retire shares.
-3.09%
Reduced diluted shares while LBL.AX is at 2.48%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
260.14%
Positive OCF growth while LBL.AX is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
209.36%
Positive FCF growth while LBL.AX is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
-37.28%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while LBL.AX stands at 228.01%. Joel Greenblatt would question if the company is failing to keep pace with industry changes.
145.79%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x LBL.AX's 46.12%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
160.72%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x LBL.AX's 25.81%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
127.83%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x LBL.AX's 45.65%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
278.97%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x LBL.AX's 30.04%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
253.00%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while LBL.AX is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
193.55%
Similar net income/share CAGR to LBL.AX's 196.67%. Walter Schloss would see parallel tailwinds or expansions for both firms.
123.72%
Positive 5Y CAGR while LBL.AX is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
3.87%
Positive short-term CAGR while LBL.AX is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
719.84%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x LBL.AX's 188.95%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
104.09%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x LBL.AX's 29.77%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-91.28%
Firm’s AR is declining while LBL.AX shows 32.45%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
121.34%
Inventory growth well above LBL.AX's 6.76%. Michael Burry suspects overshooting production or weaker sell-through vs. the competitor.
15.40%
Positive asset growth while LBL.AX is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
14.90%
Positive BV/share change while LBL.AX is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
-9.29%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
30.83%
SG&A growth well above LBL.AX's 28.87%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.