PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.00 - 0.01
0.00 - 0.02
1.30M / 496.9K (Avg.)
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-37.13%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
225.85%
Positive gross profit growth while LBL.AX is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
-24.46%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-24.46%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-40.11%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-50.00%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-33.33%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
8.39%
Share count expansion well above LBL.AX's 2.48%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
-8.85%
Reduced diluted shares while LBL.AX is at 2.48%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-93.22%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-96.76%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
-36.39%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while LBL.AX stands at 228.01%. Joel Greenblatt would question if the company is failing to keep pace with industry changes.
36.85%
5Y revenue/share CAGR at 75-90% of LBL.AX's 46.12%. Bill Ackman would encourage strategies to match competitor’s pace.
45.47%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x LBL.AX's 25.81%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
646.76%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x LBL.AX's 45.65%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
99.23%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x LBL.AX's 30.04%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
281.81%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while LBL.AX is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
124.64%
Net income/share CAGR at 50-75% of LBL.AX's 196.67%. Martin Whitman might question if the firm’s product or cost base lags behind.
-20.00%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
100.00%
Positive short-term CAGR while LBL.AX is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
190.38%
5Y equity/share CAGR is in line with LBL.AX's 188.95%. Walter Schloss would see parallel mid-term profitability and retention policies.
33.42%
3Y equity/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x LBL.AX's 29.77%. Bruce Berkowitz confirms timely buybacks or margin improvements drive stronger near-term equity growth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
165.11%
AR growth well above LBL.AX's 32.45%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
-16.74%
Inventory is declining while LBL.AX stands at 6.76%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
-14.48%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
-15.79%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
-5.14%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
-100.00%
Both reduce R&D yoy. Martin Whitman sees an industry shifting to cost reduction or limited breakthroughs in the near term.
1578.79%
SG&A growth well above LBL.AX's 28.87%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.