PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.00 - 0.01
0.00 - 0.02
1.30M / 496.9K (Avg.)
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-37.40%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
129.53%
Positive gross profit growth while LBL.AX is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
556.16%
Positive EBIT growth while LBL.AX is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
556.16%
Positive operating income growth while LBL.AX is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
-88.90%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-100.00%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-100.00%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
306.15%
Share count expansion well above LBL.AX's 2.48%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
9.27%
Diluted share count expanding well above LBL.AX's 2.48%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
126.09%
Positive OCF growth while LBL.AX is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
111.67%
Positive FCF growth while LBL.AX is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
-64.35%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while LBL.AX stands at 228.01%. Joel Greenblatt would question if the company is failing to keep pace with industry changes.
-38.26%
Negative 5Y CAGR while LBL.AX stands at 46.12%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.
-75.66%
Negative 3Y CAGR while LBL.AX stands at 25.81%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
6692.19%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x LBL.AX's 45.65%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
-75.19%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while LBL.AX is at 30.04%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s operational model or cost structure.
-88.30%
Both face negative short-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman would suspect macro or cyclical issues hitting them both.
582.30%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x LBL.AX's 196.67% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
-95.35%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
-97.71%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-53.25%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while LBL.AX is at 188.95%. Joel Greenblatt sees the competitor building net worth while this firm loses ground.
-66.93%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while LBL.AX is at 29.77%. Joel Greenblatt demands an urgent fix in capital structure or profitability vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-72.70%
Firm’s AR is declining while LBL.AX shows 32.45%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
136.98%
Inventory growth well above LBL.AX's 6.76%. Michael Burry suspects overshooting production or weaker sell-through vs. the competitor.
37.29%
Positive asset growth while LBL.AX is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
-75.05%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
69.85%
We have some new debt while LBL.AX reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
93.56%
SG&A growth well above LBL.AX's 28.87%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.