PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.00 - 0.01
0.00 - 0.02
1.30M / 496.9K (Avg.)
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-47.69%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
0.48%
Positive gross profit growth while LBL.AX is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
-48.14%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-48.14%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-64.13%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-62.96%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-62.96%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
-0.58%
Share reduction while LBL.AX is at 2.48%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
0.64%
Diluted share reduction more than 1.5x LBL.AX's 2.48%. David Dodd would validate if the company is aggressively retiring shares or limiting option exercises.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-163.45%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-180.97%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
482.38%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x LBL.AX's 228.01%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
546.35%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x LBL.AX's 46.12%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
314.68%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x LBL.AX's 25.81%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
-2943.31%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while LBL.AX stands at 45.65%. Joel Greenblatt would scrutinize managerial effectiveness and product competitiveness.
-6929.20%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while LBL.AX is at 30.04%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s operational model or cost structure.
-250.99%
Both face negative short-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman would suspect macro or cyclical issues hitting them both.
2072.00%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x LBL.AX's 196.67% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
1593.94%
Positive 5Y CAGR while LBL.AX is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
469.94%
Positive short-term CAGR while LBL.AX is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
86332.39%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x LBL.AX's 359.09%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
238.84%
5Y equity/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x LBL.AX's 188.95%. Bruce Berkowitz confirms if reinvested profits or buybacks explain the superior buildup.
74.60%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x LBL.AX's 29.77%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-62.89%
Firm’s AR is declining while LBL.AX shows 32.45%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
96.60%
Inventory growth well above LBL.AX's 6.76%. Michael Burry suspects overshooting production or weaker sell-through vs. the competitor.
19.14%
Positive asset growth while LBL.AX is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
20.81%
Positive BV/share change while LBL.AX is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
111.67%
We have some new debt while LBL.AX reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
94.56%
SG&A growth well above LBL.AX's 28.87%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.