PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.00 - 0.01
0.00 - 0.02
289 / 496.9K (Avg.)
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-44.75%
Negative revenue growth while PLUG stands at 30.14%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-44.75%
Negative gross profit growth while PLUG is at 27.61%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
282.29%
Positive EBIT growth while PLUG is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
282.29%
Operating income growth above 1.5x PLUG's 0.85%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent cost or pricing advantages drive this outperformance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
5.77%
Share reduction more than 1.5x PLUG's 19.12%. David Dodd would see if the company is taking advantage of undervaluation to retire shares.
5.77%
Diluted share reduction more than 1.5x PLUG's 19.12%. David Dodd would validate if the company is aggressively retiring shares or limiting option exercises.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-28.49%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-26.96%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
-93.18%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while PLUG stands at 11.55%. Joel Greenblatt would question if the company is failing to keep pace with industry changes.
-93.18%
Both face negative 5Y revenue/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect macro headwinds or obsolete product offerings across the niche.
359.22%
Positive 3Y CAGR while PLUG is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
38.59%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while PLUG is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
38.59%
Positive OCF/share growth while PLUG is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
23.81%
3Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of PLUG's 49.58%. Michael Burry would worry about a significant short-term disadvantage in generating operational cash.
-100.00%
Both face negative decade-long net income/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect a shrinking or highly disrupted sector.
-100.00%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
We cut SG&A while PLUG invests at 8.73%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.