PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.00 - 0.01
0.00 - 0.02
289 / 496.9K (Avg.)
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-100.00%
Negative revenue growth while PLUG stands at 30.14%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-100.00%
Negative gross profit growth while PLUG is at 27.61%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-100.00%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-100.00%
Negative operating income growth while PLUG is at 0.85%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Share reduction while PLUG is at 19.12%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while PLUG stands at 11.55%. Joel Greenblatt would question if the company is failing to keep pace with industry changes.
-100.00%
Both face negative 5Y revenue/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect macro headwinds or obsolete product offerings across the niche.
-100.00%
Both firms have negative 3Y CAGR. Martin Whitman would wonder if the entire market segment is in short-term retreat.
100.00%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while PLUG is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
100.00%
Positive OCF/share growth while PLUG is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
100.00%
3Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x PLUG's 49.58%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is quickly gaining an operational edge over the competitor.
-100.00%
Both face negative decade-long net income/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect a shrinking or highly disrupted sector.
-100.00%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.