PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.00 - 0.01
0.00 - 0.02
1.30M / 496.9K (Avg.)
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-20.00%
Negative revenue growth while PLUG stands at 5.14%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-57.72%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
-544.67%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-544.67%
Negative operating income growth while PLUG is at 7.02%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
487.94%
Net income growth above 1.5x PLUG's 6.83%. David Dodd would check if a unique moat or cost structure secures superior bottom-line gains.
234.62%
EPS growth above 1.5x PLUG's 20.30%. David Dodd would review if superior product economics or effective buybacks drive the outperformance.
280.00%
Diluted EPS growth above 1.5x PLUG's 20.30%. David Dodd would see if there's a robust moat protecting these shareholder gains.
74.90%
Share count expansion well above PLUG's 16.85%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
58.90%
Diluted share count expanding well above PLUG's 16.85%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-3736.36%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
31.79%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while PLUG is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
100.00%
OCF/share CAGR of 100.00% while PLUG is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that could compound over time.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
216.80%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x PLUG's 40.98% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
137.30%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x PLUG's 49.16%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Our R&D shrinks while PLUG invests at 2.78%. Joel Greenblatt checks if we risk falling behind a competitor’s new product pipeline.
-77.11%
We cut SG&A while PLUG invests at 23.02%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.