PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.00 - 0.01
0.00 - 0.02
289 / 496.9K (Avg.)
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
5.36%
Revenue growth under 50% of PLUG's 12.16%. Michael Burry would suspect a deteriorating sales pipeline or weaker brand.
15.75%
Positive gross profit growth while PLUG is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
34.85%
EBIT growth above 1.5x PLUG's 4.55%. David Dodd would confirm if core operations or niche positioning yield superior profitability.
34.85%
Operating income growth above 1.5x PLUG's 4.55%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent cost or pricing advantages drive this outperformance.
-100.00%
Negative net income growth while PLUG stands at 5.46%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-100.00%
Negative EPS growth while PLUG is at 5.49%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-100.00%
Negative diluted EPS growth while PLUG is at 5.49%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
69.26%
Share count expansion well above PLUG's 0.18%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
46.43%
Diluted share count expanding well above PLUG's 0.18%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-23.93%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
5424.68%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while PLUG is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-89.62%
Negative 3Y CAGR while PLUG stands at 73.11%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
95.16%
OCF/share CAGR of 95.16% while PLUG is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that could compound over time.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-123.87%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while PLUG stands at 61.29%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
100.00%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x PLUG's 57.04%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-85.69%
We cut SG&A while PLUG invests at 20.95%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.