PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.00 - 0.01
0.00 - 0.02
1.30M / 496.9K (Avg.)
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-1.28%
Negative revenue growth while PLUG stands at 21.46%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-0.16%
Negative gross profit growth while PLUG is at 37.72%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
7.61%
Positive EBIT growth while PLUG is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
7.61%
Positive operating income growth while PLUG is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
-14.06%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
19.57%
Share count expansion well above PLUG's 0.11%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
19.57%
Diluted share count expanding well above PLUG's 0.11%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
30.09%
OCF growth above 1.5x PLUG's 5.30%. David Dodd would confirm a clear edge in underlying cash generation.
26.35%
FCF growth above 1.5x PLUG's 6.41%. David Dodd would verify if the firm’s strategic investments yield superior returns.
424.83%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while PLUG is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
-91.33%
Negative 5Y CAGR while PLUG stands at 10.28%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.
-48.01%
Both firms have negative 3Y CAGR. Martin Whitman would wonder if the entire market segment is in short-term retreat.
93.13%
OCF/share CAGR of 93.13% while PLUG is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that could compound over time.
-121.25%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while PLUG is at 65.21%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s operational model or cost structure.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-111.18%
Negative 3Y CAGR while PLUG is 28.74%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-16.62%
Our R&D shrinks while PLUG invests at 11.70%. Joel Greenblatt checks if we risk falling behind a competitor’s new product pipeline.
-310.53%
We cut SG&A while PLUG invests at 23.71%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.