0.00 - 0.01
0.00 - 0.02
1.30M / 496.9K (Avg.)
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-19.26%
Negative revenue growth while PLUG stands at 12.99%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-20.12%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
-99.81%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-99.81%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-136.77%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-100.00%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-100.00%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
8.80%
Share count expansion well above PLUG's 0.55%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
8.80%
Diluted share count expanding well above PLUG's 0.55%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-110.07%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-370.56%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-43.03%
Both face negative 5Y revenue/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect macro headwinds or obsolete product offerings across the niche.
-24.94%
Both firms have negative 3Y CAGR. Martin Whitman would wonder if the entire market segment is in short-term retreat.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
95.28%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x PLUG's 17.86%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
96.04%
3Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x PLUG's 39.00%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is quickly gaining an operational edge over the competitor.
96.53%
Net income/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x PLUG's 66.22%. Bruce Berkowitz might see more effective use of capital or consistently better margins over time.
20.63%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x PLUG's 4.71%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
50.80%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x PLUG's 26.86%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
137.94%
We increase R&D while PLUG cuts. John Neff sees a short-term profit drag but a potential lead in future innovations.
-40.51%
We cut SG&A while PLUG invests at 173.29%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.