PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.00 - 0.01
0.00 - 0.02
1.30M / 496.9K (Avg.)
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
12.48%
Positive revenue growth while PLUG is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
18.99%
Positive gross profit growth while PLUG is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
70.35%
EBIT growth above 1.5x PLUG's 6.77%. David Dodd would confirm if core operations or niche positioning yield superior profitability.
70.35%
Positive operating income growth while PLUG is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
107.71%
Net income growth above 1.5x PLUG's 6.77%. David Dodd would check if a unique moat or cost structure secures superior bottom-line gains.
100.00%
EPS growth above 1.5x PLUG's 25.45%. David Dodd would review if superior product economics or effective buybacks drive the outperformance.
100.00%
Diluted EPS growth above 1.5x PLUG's 25.45%. David Dodd would see if there's a robust moat protecting these shareholder gains.
82.12%
Share count expansion well above PLUG's 23.40%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
82.12%
Diluted share count expanding well above PLUG's 23.40%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-274.48%
Negative OCF growth while PLUG is at 17.45%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-14.34%
Negative FCF growth while PLUG is at 26.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
-96.30%
Both companies have negative long-term revenue/share growth. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking.
-57.39%
Both face negative 5Y revenue/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect macro headwinds or obsolete product offerings across the niche.
-55.96%
Both firms have negative 3Y CAGR. Martin Whitman would wonder if the entire market segment is in short-term retreat.
-103.53%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while PLUG stands at 89.58%. Joel Greenblatt would scrutinize managerial effectiveness and product competitiveness.
83.39%
5Y OCF/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x PLUG's 70.04%. Bruce Berkowitz would see if capital spending or working-capital efficiencies explain the difference.
-123.37%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while PLUG stands at 80.37%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
103.52%
5Y net income/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x PLUG's 72.67%. Bruce Berkowitz would check if a better product mix or cost discipline explains the gap.
126.47%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x PLUG's 84.05%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-94.74%
Our R&D shrinks while PLUG invests at 4.10%. Joel Greenblatt checks if we risk falling behind a competitor’s new product pipeline.
580.87%
SG&A growth well above PLUG's 9.02%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.