PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.00 - 0.01
0.00 - 0.02
1.30M / 496.9K (Avg.)
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-96.30%
Both companies have negative long-term revenue/share growth. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking.
-57.39%
Negative 5Y CAGR while PLUG stands at 8.71%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.
-55.96%
Negative 3Y CAGR while PLUG stands at 62.10%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
-103.53%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while PLUG stands at 90.38%. Joel Greenblatt would scrutinize managerial effectiveness and product competitiveness.
83.39%
5Y OCF/share CAGR is similar to PLUG's 88.09%. Walter Schloss might see parallel cost profiles or expansions producing comparable cash flow.
-123.37%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while PLUG stands at 85.12%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
103.52%
5Y net income/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x PLUG's 78.29%. Bruce Berkowitz would check if a better product mix or cost discipline explains the gap.
126.47%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x PLUG's 55.76%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.