PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.00 - 0.01
0.00 - 0.02
1.30M / 496.9K (Avg.)
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-4.76%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
1.59%
Gross profit growth under 50% of PLUG's 12.46%. Michael Burry would be concerned about a severe competitive disadvantage.
59.24%
EBIT growth above 1.5x PLUG's 1.39%. David Dodd would confirm if core operations or niche positioning yield superior profitability.
59.24%
Operating income growth above 1.5x PLUG's 3.59%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent cost or pricing advantages drive this outperformance.
-96.52%
Negative net income growth while PLUG stands at 1.57%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.93%
Share reduction more than 1.5x PLUG's 61.51%. David Dodd would see if the company is taking advantage of undervaluation to retire shares.
1.93%
Diluted share reduction more than 1.5x PLUG's 61.51%. David Dodd would validate if the company is aggressively retiring shares or limiting option exercises.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
97.84%
Positive OCF growth while PLUG is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
69.41%
Positive FCF growth while PLUG is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
-90.53%
Both companies have negative long-term revenue/share growth. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking.
-56.69%
Both face negative 5Y revenue/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect macro headwinds or obsolete product offerings across the niche.
-57.18%
Both firms have negative 3Y CAGR. Martin Whitman would wonder if the entire market segment is in short-term retreat.
-100.04%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while PLUG stands at 92.76%. Joel Greenblatt would scrutinize managerial effectiveness and product competitiveness.
99.83%
5Y OCF/share CAGR is similar to PLUG's 92.28%. Walter Schloss might see parallel cost profiles or expansions producing comparable cash flow.
-100.40%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while PLUG stands at 80.20%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
-99.95%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR while PLUG is at 92.93%. Joel Greenblatt sees a major red flag in long-term profit erosion.
100.07%
5Y net income/share CAGR similar to PLUG's 91.13%. Walter Schloss might see both on parallel mid-term trajectories.
100.31%
3Y net income/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x PLUG's 78.45%. Bruce Berkowitz might see new markets, M&A, or better cost discipline driving the difference.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
6.30%
R&D dropping or stable vs. PLUG's 28.48%. David Dodd sees near-term margin benefits if the product pipeline is already strong.
-15.35%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.