PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.00 - 0.01
0.00 - 0.02
1.30M / 496.9K (Avg.)
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-0.00%
Negative revenue growth while PLUG stands at 16.32%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-0.00%
Negative gross profit growth while PLUG is at 7.55%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
0.00%
Positive EBIT growth while PLUG is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
0.00%
Positive operating income growth while PLUG is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
0.00%
Positive net income growth while PLUG is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.33%
Share reduction more than 1.5x PLUG's 37.34%. David Dodd would see if the company is taking advantage of undervaluation to retire shares.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-84.63%
Both companies have negative long-term revenue/share growth. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking.
-69.45%
Both face negative 5Y revenue/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect macro headwinds or obsolete product offerings across the niche.
-57.15%
Both firms have negative 3Y CAGR. Martin Whitman would wonder if the entire market segment is in short-term retreat.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-115.67%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while PLUG is at 95.97%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s operational model or cost structure.
-37.87%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while PLUG stands at 92.72%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
-103.43%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR while PLUG is at 93.42%. Joel Greenblatt sees a major red flag in long-term profit erosion.
-130.23%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while PLUG is 94.61%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
63.17%
3Y net income/share CAGR 50-75% of PLUG's 90.10%. Martin Whitman might see a lagging edge in short-term profitability vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.33%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
463.46%
R&D growth drastically higher vs. PLUG's 9.80%. Michael Burry fears near-term margin erosion unless breakthroughs are imminent.
-0.00%
We cut SG&A while PLUG invests at 11.58%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.