PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.00 - 0.01
0.00 - 0.02
1.30M / 496.9K (Avg.)
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-96.92%
Negative revenue growth while PLUG stands at 73.60%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-102.97%
Negative gross profit growth while PLUG is at 19.55%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-144.64%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-144.64%
Negative operating income growth while PLUG is at 0.39%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-113.30%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-28.90%
Share reduction while PLUG is at 22.97%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.00%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
22.84%
Positive FCF growth while PLUG is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.32%
AR growth is negative/stable vs. PLUG's 16.13%, indicating tighter credit discipline. David Dodd confirms it doesn't hamper actual sales.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-40.65%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
-74.37%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
100.34%
R&D growth drastically higher vs. PLUG's 1.17%. Michael Burry fears near-term margin erosion unless breakthroughs are imminent.
-66.59%
We cut SG&A while PLUG invests at 26.22%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.