PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.00 - 0.01
0.00 - 0.02
289 / 496.9K (Avg.)
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
1725.48%
Positive revenue growth while PLUG is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
2308.06%
Gross profit growth above 1.5x PLUG's 26.76%. David Dodd would confirm if the company's business model is superior in terms of production costs or pricing.
51.14%
Positive EBIT growth while PLUG is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
51.14%
Operating income growth above 1.5x PLUG's 7.42%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent cost or pricing advantages drive this outperformance.
37.21%
Positive net income growth while PLUG is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-5.82%
Share reduction while PLUG is at 29.26%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-18.99%
Reduced diluted shares while PLUG is at 29.26%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
45.04%
OCF growth above 1.5x PLUG's 0.54%. David Dodd would confirm a clear edge in underlying cash generation.
14.87%
Positive FCF growth while PLUG is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
-89.32%
Both companies have negative long-term revenue/share growth. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking.
-78.78%
Both face negative 5Y revenue/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect macro headwinds or obsolete product offerings across the niche.
-70.24%
Both firms have negative 3Y CAGR. Martin Whitman would wonder if the entire market segment is in short-term retreat.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-45.41%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while PLUG is at 93.33%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s operational model or cost structure.
580.42%
3Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x PLUG's 87.82%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is quickly gaining an operational edge over the competitor.
-101.15%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR while PLUG is at 65.40%. Joel Greenblatt sees a major red flag in long-term profit erosion.
23.00%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x PLUG's 10.68%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
87.68%
Positive short-term CAGR while PLUG is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-11.84%
Firm’s AR is declining while PLUG shows 31.44%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
7.77%
Inventory growth well above PLUG's 14.77%. Michael Burry suspects overshooting production or weaker sell-through vs. the competitor.
0.48%
Asset growth well under 50% of PLUG's 169.28%. Michael Burry sees the competitor as far more aggressive in building resources or capacity.
1432.90%
BV/share growth above 1.5x PLUG's 299.02%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
6.03%
We have some new debt while PLUG reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
-50.09%
Our R&D shrinks while PLUG invests at 61.05%. Joel Greenblatt checks if we risk falling behind a competitor’s new product pipeline.
145.68%
We expand SG&A while PLUG cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.