PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.00 - 0.01
0.00 - 0.02
289 / 496.9K (Avg.)
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-19.18%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
-35.15%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
-2.26%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-2.26%
Negative operating income growth while PLUG is at 3.43%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-74.84%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-50.00%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-50.00%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
-21.50%
Share reduction while PLUG is at 0.13%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-18.24%
Reduced diluted shares while PLUG is at 0.13%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
169.04%
Positive OCF growth while PLUG is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
159.89%
Positive FCF growth while PLUG is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
-79.60%
Both companies have negative long-term revenue/share growth. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking.
-73.73%
Both face negative 5Y revenue/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect macro headwinds or obsolete product offerings across the niche.
-42.67%
Both firms have negative 3Y CAGR. Martin Whitman would wonder if the entire market segment is in short-term retreat.
186.98%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x PLUG's 94.31%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
11.96%
Below 50% of PLUG's 90.67%. Michael Burry would be alarmed about sustained underperformance in generating free operational cash.
688.12%
3Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x PLUG's 46.93%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is quickly gaining an operational edge over the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
113.40%
5Y net income/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x PLUG's 93.17%. Bruce Berkowitz would check if a better product mix or cost discipline explains the gap.
45.44%
3Y net income/share CAGR 50-75% of PLUG's 77.30%. Martin Whitman might see a lagging edge in short-term profitability vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-9.46%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
16.00%
Inventory growth well above PLUG's 29.74%. Michael Burry suspects overshooting production or weaker sell-through vs. the competitor.
6.53%
Positive asset growth while PLUG is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
99.56%
Positive BV/share change while PLUG is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
15.85%
We have some new debt while PLUG reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
-50.02%
Our R&D shrinks while PLUG invests at 33.44%. Joel Greenblatt checks if we risk falling behind a competitor’s new product pipeline.
3.76%
We expand SG&A while PLUG cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.