PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.00 - 0.01
0.00 - 0.02
1.30M / 496.9K (Avg.)
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
10.34%
Revenue growth under 50% of PLUG's 30.92%. Michael Burry would suspect a deteriorating sales pipeline or weaker brand.
41.98%
Positive gross profit growth while PLUG is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
-161.22%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-161.22%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-79.96%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-100.00%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-100.00%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
66.97%
Share count expansion well above PLUG's 2.27%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
32.89%
Diluted share count expanding well above PLUG's 2.27%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
3.40%
Positive OCF growth while PLUG is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
7.68%
Positive FCF growth while PLUG is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
-86.67%
Both companies have negative long-term revenue/share growth. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking.
-76.60%
Both face negative 5Y revenue/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect macro headwinds or obsolete product offerings across the niche.
-59.45%
Negative 3Y CAGR while PLUG stands at 40.92%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
135.38%
10Y OCF/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x PLUG's 94.49%. Bruce Berkowitz would confirm if the firm's long-term capital allocation yields better cash returns.
848.87%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x PLUG's 93.54%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
17250.63%
3Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x PLUG's 60.90%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is quickly gaining an operational edge over the competitor.
100.59%
Similar net income/share CAGR to PLUG's 96.11%. Walter Schloss would see parallel tailwinds or expansions for both firms.
100.74%
5Y net income/share CAGR similar to PLUG's 91.85%. Walter Schloss might see both on parallel mid-term trajectories.
411.72%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x PLUG's 78.82%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-58.18%
Firm’s AR is declining while PLUG shows 48.10%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
16.10%
We show growth while PLUG is shrinking stock. John Neff wonders if the competitor is more disciplined or has weaker demand expectations.
12.10%
Similar asset growth to PLUG's 11.84%. Walter Schloss finds parallel expansions or investment rates.
-23.37%
We have a declining book value while PLUG shows 2.67%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
78.87%
Debt shrinking faster vs. PLUG's 272.44%. David Dodd sees a safer balance sheet if it doesn't impair future growth.
100.04%
R&D growth drastically higher vs. PLUG's 20.61%. Michael Burry fears near-term margin erosion unless breakthroughs are imminent.
11.35%
SG&A growth well above PLUG's 2.49%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.