PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.00 - 0.01
0.00 - 0.02
1.30M / 496.9K (Avg.)
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
28.15%
Positive revenue growth while PLUG is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
27.22%
Gross profit growth under 50% of PLUG's 101.81%. Michael Burry would be concerned about a severe competitive disadvantage.
334.31%
EBIT growth above 1.5x PLUG's 53.30%. David Dodd would confirm if core operations or niche positioning yield superior profitability.
334.31%
Operating income growth above 1.5x PLUG's 46.31%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent cost or pricing advantages drive this outperformance.
2587.67%
Net income growth above 1.5x PLUG's 53.36%. David Dodd would check if a unique moat or cost structure secures superior bottom-line gains.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-35.50%
Share reduction while PLUG is at 2.31%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-18.95%
Reduced diluted shares while PLUG is at 2.31%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-76.36%
Negative OCF growth while PLUG is at 30.69%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-78.87%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
-73.52%
Both companies have negative long-term revenue/share growth. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking.
-53.52%
Both face negative 5Y revenue/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect macro headwinds or obsolete product offerings across the niche.
8.11%
Positive 3Y CAGR while PLUG is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
112.96%
10Y OCF/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x PLUG's 97.02%. Bruce Berkowitz would confirm if the firm's long-term capital allocation yields better cash returns.
374.44%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x PLUG's 92.96%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
298.40%
3Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x PLUG's 68.57%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is quickly gaining an operational edge over the competitor.
124.44%
Net income/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x PLUG's 95.38%. Bruce Berkowitz might see more effective use of capital or consistently better margins over time.
130.79%
5Y net income/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x PLUG's 88.09%. Bruce Berkowitz would check if a better product mix or cost discipline explains the gap.
183.33%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x PLUG's 63.05%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
4378.96%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x PLUG's 305.77%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
165.91%
Our AR growth while PLUG is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
6.12%
Inventory shrinking or stable vs. PLUG's 19.53%. David Dodd confirms the company’s supply-chain is more efficient if sales are unaffected.
12.43%
Asset growth above 1.5x PLUG's 6.07%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
116.00%
Positive BV/share change while PLUG is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
-45.25%
We’re deleveraging while PLUG stands at 176.08%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
-50.01%
Our R&D shrinks while PLUG invests at 7.55%. Joel Greenblatt checks if we risk falling behind a competitor’s new product pipeline.
6.62%
We expand SG&A while PLUG cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.