PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.00 - 0.01
0.00 - 0.02
289 / 496.9K (Avg.)
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
0.95%
Positive revenue growth while PLUG is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
-6.92%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
-42.00%
Negative EBIT growth while PLUG is at 5.36%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-42.00%
Negative operating income growth while PLUG is at 0.90%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
94.54%
Positive net income growth while PLUG is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
50.00%
Positive EPS growth while PLUG is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
100.00%
Positive diluted EPS growth while PLUG is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
44.17%
Share count expansion well above PLUG's 0.05%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
37.23%
Diluted share count expanding well above PLUG's 0.05%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
267.68%
Positive OCF growth while PLUG is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
290.19%
Positive FCF growth while PLUG is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
-77.63%
Both companies have negative long-term revenue/share growth. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking.
-47.51%
Both face negative 5Y revenue/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect macro headwinds or obsolete product offerings across the niche.
-8.54%
Negative 3Y CAGR while PLUG stands at 77.05%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
156.32%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x PLUG's 94.09%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
439.03%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x PLUG's 70.76%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
214.30%
3Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x PLUG's 7.46%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is quickly gaining an operational edge over the competitor.
134.43%
Net income/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x PLUG's 94.61%. Bruce Berkowitz might see more effective use of capital or consistently better margins over time.
877.36%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x PLUG's 73.23%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
772.00%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x PLUG's 60.69%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
18383.98%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x PLUG's 1870.38%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-22.84%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
-13.53%
Inventory is declining while PLUG stands at 2.48%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
16.39%
Positive asset growth while PLUG is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
22.11%
Positive BV/share change while PLUG is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
48.69%
Debt growth far above PLUG's 7.68%. Michael Burry fears the firm is taking on undue leverage vs. the competitor.
100.04%
We increase R&D while PLUG cuts. John Neff sees a short-term profit drag but a potential lead in future innovations.
-4.79%
We cut SG&A while PLUG invests at 0.90%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.