PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.00 - 0.01
0.00 - 0.02
289 / 496.9K (Avg.)
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-19.65%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
-18.11%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
-140.60%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-140.60%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-103.99%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-100.00%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-100.00%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
-16.26%
Share reduction while PLUG is at 5.85%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-12.92%
Reduced diluted shares while PLUG is at 5.85%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-23.93%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-23.16%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
-78.54%
Both companies have negative long-term revenue/share growth. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking.
-49.63%
Both face negative 5Y revenue/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect macro headwinds or obsolete product offerings across the niche.
4.52%
3Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of PLUG's 91.21%. Michael Burry might see a serious short-term decline in relevance vs. the competitor.
151.16%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x PLUG's 89.98%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
407.95%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x PLUG's 15.85%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
31.81%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while PLUG is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
98.36%
Similar net income/share CAGR to PLUG's 90.28%. Walter Schloss would see parallel tailwinds or expansions for both firms.
-146.54%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while PLUG is 55.23%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
84.00%
3Y net income/share CAGR similar to PLUG's 77.83%. Walter Schloss would attribute it to shared growth factors or demand patterns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1408.92%
Positive short-term equity growth while PLUG is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.38%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
-7.37%
Inventory is declining while PLUG stands at 12.65%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
4.51%
Positive asset growth while PLUG is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
39.13%
Positive BV/share change while PLUG is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
-58.69%
We’re deleveraging while PLUG stands at 3.40%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
-100.00%
Both reduce R&D yoy. Martin Whitman sees an industry shifting to cost reduction or limited breakthroughs in the near term.
42.47%
SG&A growth well above PLUG's 3.89%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.