PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.00 - 0.01
0.00 - 0.02
289 / 496.9K (Avg.)
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.00%
Gross profit growth under 50% of PLUG's 61.53%. Michael Burry would be concerned about a severe competitive disadvantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.00%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-76.65%
Both companies have negative long-term revenue/share growth. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking.
-46.09%
Both face negative 5Y revenue/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect macro headwinds or obsolete product offerings across the niche.
4.52%
Positive 3Y CAGR while PLUG is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
125.06%
10Y OCF/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x PLUG's 90.73%. Bruce Berkowitz would confirm if the firm's long-term capital allocation yields better cash returns.
14602.28%
Positive OCF/share growth while PLUG is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
31.81%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while PLUG is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
99.03%
Net income/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x PLUG's 89.98%. Bruce Berkowitz might see more effective use of capital or consistently better margins over time.
-1464.60%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
84.00%
Positive short-term CAGR while PLUG is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1408.92%
Positive short-term equity growth while PLUG is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.00%
We cut SG&A while PLUG invests at 95.78%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.