PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.00 - 0.01
0.00 - 0.02
289 / 496.9K (Avg.)
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
6.06%
Revenue growth under 50% of PLUG's 171.75%. Michael Burry would suspect a deteriorating sales pipeline or weaker brand.
28.92%
Gross profit growth under 50% of PLUG's 485.78%. Michael Burry would be concerned about a severe competitive disadvantage.
380.62%
EBIT growth above 1.5x PLUG's 5.22%. David Dodd would confirm if core operations or niche positioning yield superior profitability.
380.62%
Positive operating income growth while PLUG is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
1164.40%
Net income growth above 1.5x PLUG's 3.84%. David Dodd would check if a unique moat or cost structure secures superior bottom-line gains.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.99%
Share reduction while PLUG is at 2.47%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
81.42%
OCF growth above 1.5x PLUG's 33.41%. David Dodd would confirm a clear edge in underlying cash generation.
-360.42%
Negative FCF growth while PLUG is at 32.34%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
-74.99%
Both companies have negative long-term revenue/share growth. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking.
-42.26%
Negative 5Y CAGR while PLUG stands at 116.37%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.
-3.11%
Negative 3Y CAGR while PLUG stands at 132.05%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
145.92%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x PLUG's 91.61%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
26672.25%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x PLUG's 45.92%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
184.38%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while PLUG is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
110.42%
Net income/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x PLUG's 89.61%. Bruce Berkowitz might see more effective use of capital or consistently better margins over time.
14569.42%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x PLUG's 33.23%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
10.26%
Positive short-term CAGR while PLUG is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
479.91%
Positive short-term equity growth while PLUG is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-56.88%
Firm’s AR is declining while PLUG shows 246.27%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
12.80%
Inventory growth well above PLUG's 4.65%. Michael Burry suspects overshooting production or weaker sell-through vs. the competitor.
35.81%
Asset growth above 1.5x PLUG's 20.61%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
3.76%
Positive BV/share change while PLUG is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
15122.66%
Debt growth far above PLUG's 47.73%. Michael Burry fears the firm is taking on undue leverage vs. the competitor.
92.32%
R&D growth drastically higher vs. PLUG's 12.24%. Michael Burry fears near-term margin erosion unless breakthroughs are imminent.
-33.57%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.