PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.00 - 0.01
0.00 - 0.02
289 / 496.9K (Avg.)
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.00%
OCF growth under 50% of PLUG's 11.97%. Michael Burry might suspect questionable revenue recognition or rising costs.
0.00%
Positive FCF growth while PLUG is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
-68.82%
Both companies have negative long-term revenue/share growth. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking.
2.04%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of PLUG's 65.75%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
23.51%
3Y revenue/share CAGR at 50-75% of PLUG's 34.58%. Martin Whitman would question if the firm lags behind competitor innovations.
-134.17%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while PLUG stands at 94.69%. Joel Greenblatt would scrutinize managerial effectiveness and product competitiveness.
-118.13%
Both show negative mid-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman might suspect a challenged environment or large capital demands for both.
-124.87%
Both face negative short-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman would suspect macro or cyclical issues hitting them both.
177.00%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x PLUG's 95.35% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
133.44%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x PLUG's 13.62%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
100.00%
Positive short-term CAGR while PLUG is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
9681.11%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x PLUG's 16.76%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
260.24%
Positive short-term equity growth while PLUG is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
29.78%
AR growth well above PLUG's 37.08%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.