PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.00 - 0.01
0.00 - 0.02
289 / 496.9K (Avg.)
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
187.83%
Positive revenue growth while PLUG is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
141.82%
Positive gross profit growth while PLUG is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
1131.48%
Positive EBIT growth while PLUG is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
1131.48%
Positive operating income growth while PLUG is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
682.71%
Positive net income growth while PLUG is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
500.00%
Positive EPS growth while PLUG is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
500.00%
Positive diluted EPS growth while PLUG is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
-3.85%
Share reduction while PLUG is at 0.85%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-2.97%
Reduced diluted shares while PLUG is at 0.85%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1723.26%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-4204.46%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
-31.83%
Both companies have negative long-term revenue/share growth. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking.
221.27%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x PLUG's 102.24%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
105.69%
Positive 3Y CAGR while PLUG is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
-277.17%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while PLUG stands at 83.51%. Joel Greenblatt would scrutinize managerial effectiveness and product competitiveness.
-424.53%
Both show negative mid-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman might suspect a challenged environment or large capital demands for both.
-668.10%
Both face negative short-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman would suspect macro or cyclical issues hitting them both.
408.00%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x PLUG's 75.77% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
500.00%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x PLUG's 72.87%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
60.00%
Positive short-term CAGR while PLUG is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1831.22%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while PLUG is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
116.58%
Positive short-term equity growth while PLUG is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
219.76%
Our AR growth while PLUG is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
-7.99%
Inventory is declining while PLUG stands at 36.66%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
28.58%
Asset growth above 1.5x PLUG's 1.50%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
27.93%
Positive BV/share change while PLUG is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
51.86%
Debt growth far above PLUG's 4.74%. Michael Burry fears the firm is taking on undue leverage vs. the competitor.
-100.00%
Both reduce R&D yoy. Martin Whitman sees an industry shifting to cost reduction or limited breakthroughs in the near term.
15.25%
SG&A growth well above PLUG's 3.65%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.