PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.00 - 0.01
0.00 - 0.02
289 / 496.9K (Avg.)
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-10.31%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
-20.84%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
11.25%
Positive EBIT growth while PLUG is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
11.25%
Positive operating income growth while PLUG is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
-11.48%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-25.00%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.20%
Share reduction more than 1.5x PLUG's 2.44%. David Dodd would see if the company is taking advantage of undervaluation to retire shares.
-3.09%
Reduced diluted shares while PLUG is at 2.44%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
260.14%
OCF growth above 1.5x PLUG's 72.90%. David Dodd would confirm a clear edge in underlying cash generation.
209.36%
FCF growth above 1.5x PLUG's 64.14%. David Dodd would verify if the firm’s strategic investments yield superior returns.
-37.28%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while PLUG stands at 21.16%. Joel Greenblatt would question if the company is failing to keep pace with industry changes.
145.79%
5Y revenue/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x PLUG's 103.08%. Bruce Berkowitz would verify if cost efficiency or pricing power supports this advantage.
160.72%
3Y revenue/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x PLUG's 144.60%. Bruce Berkowitz might see better product or regional expansions than the competitor.
127.83%
10Y OCF/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x PLUG's 97.87%. Bruce Berkowitz would confirm if the firm's long-term capital allocation yields better cash returns.
278.97%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x PLUG's 78.61%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
253.00%
3Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x PLUG's 81.85%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is quickly gaining an operational edge over the competitor.
193.55%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x PLUG's 88.60% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
123.72%
Positive 5Y CAGR while PLUG is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
3.87%
Positive short-term CAGR while PLUG is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
719.84%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while PLUG is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
104.09%
Positive short-term equity growth while PLUG is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-91.28%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
121.34%
Inventory growth well above PLUG's 10.13%. Michael Burry suspects overshooting production or weaker sell-through vs. the competitor.
15.40%
Asset growth at 50-75% of PLUG's 21.67%. Martin Whitman questions if the firm is lagging expansions or if the competitor invests more aggressively.
14.90%
Positive BV/share change while PLUG is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
-9.29%
We’re deleveraging while PLUG stands at 27.81%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
30.83%
We expand SG&A while PLUG cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.