PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.00 - 0.01
0.00 - 0.02
289 / 496.9K (Avg.)
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-76.37%
Negative revenue growth while PLUG stands at 57.17%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-60.22%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
-82.23%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-82.23%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-81.32%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-80.00%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-80.00%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
4.62%
Share reduction more than 1.5x PLUG's 17.17%. David Dodd would see if the company is taking advantage of undervaluation to retire shares.
12.14%
Diluted share count expanding well above PLUG's 17.17%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-54.43%
Negative OCF growth while PLUG is at 10.87%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-32.83%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
-50.22%
Both companies have negative long-term revenue/share growth. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking.
112.77%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x PLUG's 62.73%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
49.41%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x PLUG's 5.99%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
4276.79%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x PLUG's 89.18%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
457.75%
Positive OCF/share growth while PLUG is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
259.99%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while PLUG is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
121.31%
Net income/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x PLUG's 84.98%. Bruce Berkowitz might see more effective use of capital or consistently better margins over time.
2783.33%
Positive 5Y CAGR while PLUG is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
0.58%
Below 50% of PLUG's 41.53%. Michael Burry suspects a steep short-term disadvantage in bottom-line expansion.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
609.64%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x PLUG's 98.58%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
87.12%
Below 50% of PLUG's 333.09%. Michael Burry suspects a serious short-term disadvantage in building book value.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-76.11%
Firm’s AR is declining while PLUG shows 148.52%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
5.31%
Inventory shrinking or stable vs. PLUG's 17.23%. David Dodd confirms the company’s supply-chain is more efficient if sales are unaffected.
1.87%
Asset growth well under 50% of PLUG's 45.65%. Michael Burry sees the competitor as far more aggressive in building resources or capacity.
-0.88%
We have a declining book value while PLUG shows 119.60%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
-13.08%
We’re deleveraging while PLUG stands at 7.24%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-35.81%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.