0.00 - 0.01
0.00 - 0.02
289 / 496.9K (Avg.)
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
110.57%
Positive revenue growth while PLUG is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
-58.43%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
61.64%
Positive EBIT growth while PLUG is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
61.64%
Positive operating income growth while PLUG is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
100.00%
Positive net income growth while PLUG is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
100.00%
Positive EPS growth while PLUG is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
50.00%
Positive diluted EPS growth while PLUG is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
-4.41%
Share reduction while PLUG is at 14.65%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
6.04%
Diluted share reduction more than 1.5x PLUG's 14.65%. David Dodd would validate if the company is aggressively retiring shares or limiting option exercises.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
100.00%
Similar OCF growth to PLUG's 101.32%. Walter Schloss would assume comparable operations or industry factors.
100.00%
FCF growth above 1.5x PLUG's 62.27%. David Dodd would verify if the firm’s strategic investments yield superior returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
368.71%
Positive 5Y CAGR while PLUG is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
229.13%
Positive 3Y CAGR while PLUG is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1067.01%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x PLUG's 102.50%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
653.23%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while PLUG is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
5933.00%
Positive 5Y CAGR while PLUG is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
110.45%
Positive short-term CAGR while PLUG is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
644.83%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x PLUG's 386.79%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
79.50%
Below 50% of PLUG's 968.22%. Michael Burry suspects a serious short-term disadvantage in building book value.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.00%
Inventory is declining while PLUG stands at 3.78%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
0.00%
Asset growth well under 50% of PLUG's 50.02%. Michael Burry sees the competitor as far more aggressive in building resources or capacity.
4.96%
Under 50% of PLUG's 107.22%. Michael Burry raises concerns about the firm’s ability to build intrinsic value relative to its rival.
9.21%
We have some new debt while PLUG reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-94.11%
We cut SG&A while PLUG invests at 102.81%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.