PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.00 - 0.01
0.00 - 0.02
1.30M / 496.9K (Avg.)
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-37.13%
Negative revenue growth while PLUG stands at 122.75%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
225.85%
Gross profit growth above 1.5x PLUG's 97.12%. David Dodd would confirm if the company's business model is superior in terms of production costs or pricing.
-24.46%
Negative EBIT growth while PLUG is at 90.28%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-24.46%
Negative operating income growth while PLUG is at 89.74%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-40.11%
Negative net income growth while PLUG stands at 87.24%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-50.00%
Negative EPS growth while PLUG is at 89.29%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-33.33%
Negative diluted EPS growth while PLUG is at 89.29%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
8.39%
Share reduction more than 1.5x PLUG's 20.71%. David Dodd would see if the company is taking advantage of undervaluation to retire shares.
-8.85%
Reduced diluted shares while PLUG is at 20.71%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-93.22%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-96.76%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
-36.39%
Both companies have negative long-term revenue/share growth. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking.
36.85%
5Y revenue/share CAGR at 50-75% of PLUG's 64.65%. Martin Whitman would worry about a lagging mid-term growth trajectory.
45.47%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x PLUG's 9.39%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
646.76%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x PLUG's 58.20%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
99.23%
Positive OCF/share growth while PLUG is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
281.81%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while PLUG is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
124.64%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x PLUG's 78.40% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
-20.00%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
100.00%
Positive short-term CAGR while PLUG is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
190.38%
Below 50% of PLUG's 1387.23%. Michael Burry sees a substantially weaker mid-term book value expansion strategy in place.
33.42%
Below 50% of PLUG's 4293.81%. Michael Burry suspects a serious short-term disadvantage in building book value.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
165.11%
Our AR growth while PLUG is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
-16.74%
Inventory is declining while PLUG stands at 34.68%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
-14.48%
Negative asset growth while PLUG invests at 157.02%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
-15.79%
We have a declining book value while PLUG shows 177.80%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
-5.14%
We’re deleveraging while PLUG stands at 18.95%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
-100.00%
Both reduce R&D yoy. Martin Whitman sees an industry shifting to cost reduction or limited breakthroughs in the near term.
1578.79%
We expand SG&A while PLUG cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.