PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.00 - 0.01
0.00 - 0.02
289 / 496.9K (Avg.)
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
100.00%
Revenue growth 1.25-1.5x PLUG's 73.10%. Bruce Berkowitz would check if differentiation or pricing power justifies outperformance.
-27.20%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
-47.00%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-47.00%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
100.00%
Positive net income growth while PLUG is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
100.00%
Positive EPS growth while PLUG is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
100.00%
Positive diluted EPS growth while PLUG is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
-7.26%
Share reduction while PLUG is at 10.43%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-7.26%
Reduced diluted shares while PLUG is at 10.43%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
115.67%
Dividend growth of 115.67% while PLUG is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would see if this can become a bigger advantage long term.
100.00%
Positive OCF growth while PLUG is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
100.00%
Positive FCF growth while PLUG is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
122.13%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while PLUG is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
196.31%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x PLUG's 93.57%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
213.73%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x PLUG's 17.91%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
673.45%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x PLUG's 37.41%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
331.39%
Positive OCF/share growth while PLUG is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
492.10%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while PLUG is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
1154.67%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x PLUG's 57.53% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
73.23%
Positive 5Y CAGR while PLUG is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
331.33%
Positive short-term CAGR while PLUG is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
214.38%
Below 50% of PLUG's 1365.64%. Michael Burry sees a substantially weaker mid-term book value expansion strategy in place.
43.87%
Below 50% of PLUG's 6888.17%. Michael Burry suspects a serious short-term disadvantage in building book value.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
7.83%
Positive BV/share change while PLUG is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
7.61%
SG&A declining or stable vs. PLUG's 51.11%. David Dodd sees better overhead efficiency if it doesn't hamper revenue.