PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.00 - 0.01
0.00 - 0.02
289 / 496.9K (Avg.)
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-62.12%
Negative revenue growth while PLUG stands at 15.55%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-4.76%
Negative gross profit growth while PLUG is at 22.88%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-133.92%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-133.92%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-104.47%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-100.00%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-100.00%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
-3.68%
Share reduction while PLUG is at 1.32%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-7.83%
Reduced diluted shares while PLUG is at 1.32%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
-100.00%
Dividend reduction while PLUG stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
49.89%
OCF growth above 1.5x PLUG's 21.36%. David Dodd would confirm a clear edge in underlying cash generation.
180.79%
Positive FCF growth while PLUG is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
-12.63%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while PLUG stands at 3.85%. Joel Greenblatt would question if the company is failing to keep pace with industry changes.
66.44%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of PLUG's 157.34%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
68.94%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x PLUG's 3.17%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
992.35%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x PLUG's 32.77%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
163.21%
Positive OCF/share growth while PLUG is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
1886.98%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while PLUG is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
-158.18%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR while PLUG is at 33.07%. Joel Greenblatt sees a major red flag in long-term profit erosion.
-105.95%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
69.70%
Positive short-term CAGR while PLUG is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
164.53%
Below 50% of PLUG's 1478.51%. Michael Burry sees a substantially weaker mid-term book value expansion strategy in place.
90.05%
Below 50% of PLUG's 12352.77%. Michael Burry suspects a serious short-term disadvantage in building book value.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-63.41%
Firm’s AR is declining while PLUG shows 44.89%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
-10.39%
Inventory is declining while PLUG stands at 9.53%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
9.77%
Positive asset growth while PLUG is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
2.75%
Positive BV/share change while PLUG is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
-13.80%
We’re deleveraging while PLUG stands at 3.45%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-5.29%
We cut SG&A while PLUG invests at 9.75%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.