0.00 - 0.01
0.00 - 0.02
289 / 496.9K (Avg.)
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
100.00%
Revenue growth above 1.5x PLUG's 12.49%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has a unique advantage driving sales higher.
-88.15%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
-493.85%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-493.85%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-100.00%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
3.82%
Share count expansion well above PLUG's 0.40%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
8.50%
Diluted share count expanding well above PLUG's 0.40%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
100.00%
OCF growth 1.25-1.5x PLUG's 90.50%. Bruce Berkowitz would see if superior pricing or efficient operations explain the gap.
100.00%
FCF growth above 1.5x PLUG's 45.07%. David Dodd would verify if the firm’s strategic investments yield superior returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
220.63%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x PLUG's 55.61%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
225.44%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x PLUG's 2.63%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
407.05%
Positive OCF/share growth while PLUG is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
3727.79%
3Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x PLUG's 77.03%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is quickly gaining an operational edge over the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-111.47%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
41.62%
Positive short-term CAGR while PLUG is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
154.82%
Below 50% of PLUG's 1594.87%. Michael Burry sees a substantially weaker mid-term book value expansion strategy in place.
83.07%
Below 50% of PLUG's 64274.25%. Michael Burry suspects a serious short-term disadvantage in building book value.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
416.89%
Our AR growth while PLUG is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
-0.00%
Inventory is declining while PLUG stands at 17.12%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
0.00%
Asset growth well under 50% of PLUG's 3.66%. Michael Burry sees the competitor as far more aggressive in building resources or capacity.
-3.67%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
9.28%
Debt growth far above PLUG's 11.00%. Michael Burry fears the firm is taking on undue leverage vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-48.46%
We cut SG&A while PLUG invests at 72.56%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.